OpenBU

Does Nature Have Rights? Ethical Implications in Ecology

OpenBU

Show simple item record

dc.creator Bitney, Kate
dc.date 2000-01-01
dc.date.accessioned 2012-08-21T19:53:19Z
dc.date.available 2012-08-21T19:53:19Z
dc.date.issued 2012-08-21
dc.identifier http://digilib.bu.edu/journals/ojs/index.php/jfse/article/view/87
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2144/3981
dc.description In this essay, the author approaches the question \"Does Nature Have Rights ? \" from an ecofeminist perspective, using Aeschylus\' The Eumenides as emblematic of resignifying woman/nature as nonsubject, and working primarily from Val Plumwood\'s Feminism and the Mastery of Nature, with reference to the work of Grosz, Irigaray, Lovelock and others. She considers ontologies of nature as \"intentional,\" \"living\" and as a \"being\" entitled to rights, and weighs the question of revisiting metaphysics in developing an account of nature that would yield an ethos favorable to the health of planet Earth. This account refers to what Irigaray has called \"another pannisia of the divine.\"
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Boston Theological Institute
dc.relation http://digilib.bu.edu/journals/ojs/index.php/jfse/article/view/87/87
dc.source Journal of Faith and Science Exchange; Journal of Faith and Science Exchange, Vol. 4
dc.title Does Nature Have Rights? Ethical Implications in Ecology
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search OpenBU


Browse

Deposit Materials

Statistics