The Quality of Care for Adults with Epilepsy: An Initial Glimpse Using the QUIET Measure

OpenBU

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pugh, Mary Jo en_US
dc.contributor.author Berlowitz, Dan R en_US
dc.contributor.author Rao, Jaya K en_US
dc.contributor.author Shapiro, Gabriel en_US
dc.contributor.author Avetisyan, Ruzan en_US
dc.contributor.author Hanchate, Amresh en_US
dc.contributor.author Jarrett, Kelli en_US
dc.contributor.author Tabares, Jeffrey en_US
dc.contributor.author Kazis, Lewis E en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2011-12-29T23:09:23Z
dc.date.available 2011-12-29T23:09:23Z
dc.date.copyright 2011 en_US
dc.date.issued 2011-1-3 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Pugh, Mary Jo, Dan R Berlowitz, Jaya K Rao, Gabriel Shapiro, Ruzan Avetisyan, Amresh Hanchate, Kelli Jarrett, Jeffrey Tabares, Lewis E Kazis. "The quality of care for adults with epilepsy: an initial glimpse using the QUIET measure." BMC Health Services Research 11:1. (2011) en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1472-6963 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2144/2636
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: We examined the quality of adult epilepsy care using the Quality Indicators in Epilepsy Treatment (QUIET) measure, and variations in quality based on the source of epilepsy care. METHODS: We identified 311 individuals with epilepsy diagnosis between 2004 and 2007 in a tertiary medical center in New England. We abstracted medical charts to identify the extent to which participants received quality indicator (QI) concordant care for individual QI's and the proportion of recommended care processes completed for different aspects of epilepsy care over a two year period. Finally, we compared the proportion of recommended care processes completed for those receiving care only in primary care, neurology clinics, or care shared between primary care and neurology providers. RESULTS: The mean proportion of concordant care by indicator was 55.6 (standard deviation = 31.5). Of the 1985 possible care processes, 877 (44.2%) were performed; care specific to women had the lowest concordance (37% vs. 42% [first seizure evaluation], 44% [initial epilepsy treatment], 45% [chronic care]). Individuals receiving shared care had more aspects of QI concordant care performed than did those receiving neurology care for initial treatment (53% vs. 43%; X2 = 9.0; p = 0.01) and chronic epilepsy care (55% vs. 42%; X2 = 30.2; p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Similar to most other chronic diseases, less than half of recommended care processes were performed. Further investigation is needed to understand whether a shared-care model enhances quality of care, and if so, how it leads to improvements in quality. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Centers for Disease Control and Prevention en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BioMed Central en_US
dc.rights Copyright 2011 Pugh et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. en_US
dc.title The Quality of Care for Adults with Epilepsy: An Initial Glimpse Using the QUIET Measure en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1186/1472-6963-11-1 en_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid 21199575 en_US
dc.identifier.pmcid 3024216 en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search OpenBU


Advanced Search

Browse

Deposit Materials