Performance of Random Forest When SNPs Are in Linkage Disequilibrium

OpenBU

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Meng, Yan A en_US
dc.contributor.author Yu, Yi en_US
dc.contributor.author Cupples, L Adrienne en_US
dc.contributor.author Farrer, Lindsay A en_US
dc.contributor.author Lunetta, Kathryn L en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2012-01-09T20:53:11Z
dc.date.available 2012-01-09T20:53:11Z
dc.date.copyright 2009 en_US
dc.date.issued 2009-3-5 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Meng, Yan A, Yi Yu, L Adrienne Cupples, Lindsay A Farrer, Kathryn L Lunetta. "Performance of random forest when SNPs are in linkage disequilibrium" BMC Bioinformatics 10:78. (2009) en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1471-2105 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2144/2879
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) may be correlated due to linkage disequilibrium (LD). Association studies look for both direct and indirect associations with disease loci. In a Random Forest (RF) analysis, correlation between a true risk SNP and SNPs in LD may lead to diminished variable importance for the true risk SNP. One approach to address this problem is to select SNPs in linkage equilibrium (LE) for analysis. Here, we explore alternative methods for dealing with SNPs in LD: change the tree-building algorithm by building each tree in an RF only with SNPs in LE, modify the importance measure (IM), and use haplotypes instead of SNPs to build a RF. RESULTS. We evaluated the performance of our alternative methods by simulation of a spectrum of complex genetics models. When a haplotype rather than an individual SNP is the risk factor, we find that the original Random Forest method performed on SNPs provides good performance. When individual, genotyped SNPs are the risk factors, we find that the stronger the genetic effect, the stronger the effect LD has on the performance of the original RF. A revised importance measure used with the original RF is relatively robust to LD among SNPs; this revised importance measure used with the revised RF is sometimes inflated. Overall, we find that the revised importance measure used with the original RF is the best choice when the genetic model and the number of SNPs in LD with risk SNPs are unknown. For the haplotype-based method, under a multiplicative heterogeneity model, we observed a decrease in the performance of RF with increasing LD among the SNPs in the haplotype. CONCLUSION. Our results suggest that by strategically revising the Random Forest method tree-building or importance measure calculation, power can increase when LD exists between SNPs. We conclude that the revised Random Forest method performed on SNPs offers an advantage of not requiring genotype phase, making it a viable tool for use in the context of thousands of SNPs, such as candidate gene studies and follow-up of top candidates from genome wide association studies. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Fonds de la Recherche en Santé; National Institutes of Health (R01-AG09029, R01-AG25259, R01-AG17173); National Institutes of Health & National Center for Research Resources Shared Instrumentation Grant (1S10RR163736) en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BioMed Central en_US
dc.rights Copyright 2009 Meng et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. en_US
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 en_US
dc.title Performance of Random Forest When SNPs Are in Linkage Disequilibrium en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1186/1471-2105-10-78 en_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid 19265542 en_US
dc.identifier.pmcid 2666661 en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search OpenBU


Advanced Search

Browse

Deposit Materials