Proposing a Model of "Hypostatic Union" for a Fruitful Science-Religion Relationship


Show simple item record

dc.creator Emeka, Udechukwu Anthony 2000-01-01 2012-08-21T19:53:21Z 2012-08-21T19:53:21Z 2012-08-21
dc.description Karl Rahner affirmed that, methodologically, practical science should be atheistic. This cannot be truer in our time, when science is making giant progressive strides every day, solving serious problems, helping to affirm human autonomy and independence from the absolute, and consciously or unconsciously deleting from mental categories every reference to the miraculous. This situation calls for a reworking of a possible and enduring reconnection of practical science with theology, so that the methodological atheism of practical science does not become a manner of living, and so that the seeming dumbness of religion before the ever-advancing practical science does not transform itself into an intellectual unproductivity. The author proposes a hypostatic model for a return to a fruitful relationship between the two disciplines.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Boston Theological Institute
dc.source Journal of Faith and Science Exchange; Journal of Faith and Science Exchange, Vol. 4
dc.title Proposing a Model of "Hypostatic Union" for a Fruitful Science-Religion Relationship
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search OpenBU

Advanced Search


Deposit Materials