Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUmanzio, Carl Beemanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-13T20:11:11Z
dc.date.available2015-04-13T20:11:11Z
dc.date.issued1940en_US
dc.date.submitted1940en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2144/10912
dc.descriptionThesis (M.A.)--Boston University, 1940 N.B.: page 68 is missing from this thesis. Page 83 appears to be missing, but we believe this is the result of misnumbering by the author, and no actual content is missing at that location.en_US
dc.description.abstractBriefly, this study was made for the purpose of comparing five recent biology textbooks based on the unit plan and five on the traditional chapter method in an effort to determine: a) the topics treated, b) the amount of space and the percentage of space devoted to each topic, c) the sequence of topics, d) the various methods of presentation of the topic, e) the number and types of illustrations, f) the organization of the contents of the textbooks, and g) the integration of chapter or units for each major textbook. [TRUNCATED]en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBoston Universityen_US
dc.rightsBased on investigation of the BU Libraries' staff, this work is free of known copyright restrictionsen_US
dc.titleComparative analysis of ten textbooks in biology at the secondary-school level, five on the so-called unit and five on the traditional chapter plan.en_US
dc.typeThesis/Dissertationen_US
etd.degree.nameMaster of Artsen_US
etd.degree.levelmastersen_US
etd.degree.disciplineEducationen_US
etd.degree.grantorBoston Universityen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record