Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaneoka, Asako Satohen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-07T03:17:07Z
dc.date.available2015-08-07T03:17:07Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.submitted2013
dc.identifier.other(ALMA)contemp
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2144/12790
dc.descriptionThesis (M.S.)--Boston University PLEASE NOTE: Boston University Libraries did not receive an Authorization To Manage form for this thesis or dissertation. It is therefore not openly accessible, though it may be available by request. If you are the author or principal advisor of this work and would like to request open access for it, please contact us at open-help@bu.edu. Thank you.en_US
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To date, there is no validated scale for grading the severity of pharyngeal residue. To address this problem, The Boston Residue and Clearance Scale (BRAGS) was constructed and assessed for reliability and validity. METHODS: A team including 5 Speech Language Pathologists (SLPs) at Boston Medical Center conceptualized BRAGS. BRAGS is an 11-point scale comprised of three main components: 1) amount and location of residue, 2) whether a patient executes clearing swallows spontaneously, and 3) the effectiveness of any clearing swallows. Face validity was confirmed by the team. A movie containing 63 unique swallows was created from previously recorded Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) procedures. First, four SLPs independently scored the severity of residue for each swallow using clinical judgment (none, mild, mild-moderate, moderate, moderate-severe, severe). The 63 swallows were re-randomized in a second movie and scored in the same manner one week later. Next, the same SLPs were trained to use BRAGS. A 5th SLP who is an expert in FEES served as a gold standard. When concordance of the four raters and the gold standard was acceptable, the four SLPs were given the initial movie to score using BRAGS. After one week, they scored the second movie with BRAGS. In BRAGS, inter-rater reliability and test-retest (intra-rater) reliability were estimated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The correlation between each rater and the 5th SLP in the first clinical judgment and in the BRAGS trial was also examined with ICCs in order to confirm the raters' accuracy in rating. Concurrent validity of BRAGS to clinical judgment was tested with Pearson's correlation coefficient. Internal consistency of BRAGS was tested with Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: Inter-rater ICC for the first clinical judgment was 0.60, and for the first BRAGS trial was 0.81. Test-retest ICCs for the clinical judgment of four SLPs ranged between 0.72 and 0.86, and for BRAGS it ranged between 0.82 and 0.92. Correlation between each rater and the 5th SLP for the first clinical judgment was 0.69 and for the first BRAGS trial was 0.80. Pearson's correlation coefficient demonstrated high concurrent validity of BRAGS to the clinical judgment (r=0.76). Cronbach's alpha showed good internal consistency of all items included in BRAGS (ICC=0.86). CONCLUSION: Excellent inter-rater and test-retest reliability demonstrated that BRAGS is more reliable than clinical judgment when rating severity of pharyngeal residue. Internal consistency and concurrent validity were confirmed.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherBoston Universityen_US
dc.titleThe Boston residue and clearance scale: preliminary reliability and validity testingen_US
dc.typeThesis/Dissertationen_US
etd.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen_US
etd.degree.levelmastersen_US
etd.degree.disciplineSpeech, Language, and Hearing Sciencesen_US
etd.degree.grantorBoston Universityen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record