JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    •   OpenBU
    • School of Public Health
    • Department of Environmental Health
    • SPH Environmental Health Papers and Presentations
    • View Item
    •   OpenBU
    • School of Public Health
    • Department of Environmental Health
    • SPH Environmental Health Papers and Presentations
    • View Item

    Bias magnification in ecologic studies: a methodological investigation

    Thumbnail
    Download/View
    1476-069X-6-17.pdf (964.5Kb)
    License
    Copyright 2007 Webster; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    Date Issued
    2007-7-5
    Related DOI
    10.1186/1476-069X-6-17
    Author
    Webster, Thomas F.
    Share to FacebookShare to TwitterShare by Email
    Export Citation
    Download to BibTex
    Download to EndNote/RefMan (RIS)
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Permanent Link
    https://hdl.handle.net/2144/2612
    Citation
    Webster, Thomas F. "Bias magnification in ecologic studies: a methodological investigation" Environmental Health 6:17. (2007)
    Abstract
    BACKGROUND: As ecologic studies are often inexpensive to conduct, consideration of the magnitude and direction of ecologic biases may be useful in both study design and sensitivity analysis of results. This paper examines three types of ecologic bias: confounding by group, effect measure modification by group, and non-differential exposure misclassification. METHODS: Bias of the risk difference on the individual and ecologic levels are compared using two-by-two tables, simple equations, and risk diagrams. Risk diagrams provide a convenient way to simultaneously display information from both levels. RESULTS: Confounding by group and effect measure modification by group act in the same direction on the individual and group levels, but have larger impact on the latter. The reduction in exposure variance caused by aggregation magnifies the individual level bias due to ignoring groups. For some studies, the magnification factor can be calculated from the ecologic data alone. Small magnification factors indicate little bias beyond that occurring at the individual level. Aggregation is also responsible for the different impacts of non-differential exposure misclassification on individual and ecologic studies. CONCLUSION: The analytical tools developed here are useful in analyzing ecologic bias. The concept of bias magnification may be helpful in designing ecologic studies and performing sensitivity analysis of their results.
    Rights
    Copyright 2007 Webster; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    Collections
    • SPH Environmental Health Papers and Presentations [90]

    Contact Us | Send Feedback | Help
     

     

    Browse

    All of OpenBUCommunities & CollectionsIssue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionIssue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    Deposit Materials

    LoginNon-BU Registration

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Contact Us | Send Feedback | Help