Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCosgrove, Elissa J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGardner, Timothy S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKolaczyk, Eric D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-11T00:37:38Z
dc.date.available2012-01-11T00:37:38Z
dc.date.copyright2010
dc.date.issued2010-9-9
dc.identifier.citationCosgrove, Elissa J., Timothy S. Gardner, Eric D. Kolaczyk. "On the Choice and Number of Microarrays for Transcriptional Regulatory Network Inference" BMC Bioinformatics 11:454. (2010)
dc.identifier.issn1471-2105
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2144/2995
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND. Transcriptional regulatory network inference (TRNI) from large compendia of DNA microarrays has become a fundamental approach for discovering transcription factor (TF)-gene interactions at the genome-wide level. In correlation-based TRNI, network edges can in principle be evaluated using standard statistical tests. However, while such tests nominally assume independent microarray experiments, we expect dependency between the experiments in microarray compendia, due to both project-specific factors (e.g., microarray preparation, environmental effects) in the multi-project compendium setting and effective dependency induced by gene-gene correlations. Herein, we characterize the nature of dependency in an Escherichia coli microarray compendium and explore its consequences on the problem of determining which and how many arrays to use in correlation-based TRNI. RESULTS. We present evidence of substantial effective dependency among microarrays in this compendium, and characterize that dependency with respect to experimental condition factors. We then introduce a measure neff of the effective number of experiments in a compendium, and find that corresponding to the dependency observed in this particular compendium there is a huge reduction in effective sample size i.e., neff = 14.7 versus n = 376. Furthermore, we found that the neff of select subsets of experiments actually exceeded neff of the full compendium, suggesting that the adage 'less is more' applies here. Consistent with this latter result, we observed improved performance in TRNI using subsets of the data compared to results using the full compendium. We identified experimental condition factors that trend with changes in TRNI performance and neff , including growth phase and media type. Finally, using the set of known E. coli genetic regulatory interactions from RegulonDB, we demonstrated that false discovery rates (FDR) derived from neff -adjusted p-values were well-matched to FDR based on the RegulonDB truth set. CONCLUSIONS. These results support utilization of neff as a potent descriptor of microarray compendia. In addition, they highlight a straightforward correlation-based method for TRNI with demonstrated meaningful statistical testing for significant edges, readily applicable to compendia from any species, even when a truth set is not available. This work facilitates a more refined approach to construction and utilization of mRNA expression compendia in TRNI.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation - National Institutes of Health Mathematical Biology Program (1R01GM078987-01); Office of Naval Research (N00014-09-1-0654)en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.rightsCopyright 2010 Cosgrove et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0
dc.titleOn the Choice and Number of Microarrays for Transcriptional Regulatory Network Inferenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2105-11-454
dc.identifier.pmid20825684
dc.identifier.pmcid2949888


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright 2010 Cosgrove et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright 2010 Cosgrove et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.