Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoldis, Evgeniy A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRuiz, Pablo A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCaramanis, Michael C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLi, Xiaoguangen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhilbrick, C. Russen_US
dc.contributor.authorRudkevich, Aleksandr M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-19T19:44:34Z
dc.date.available2018-07-19T19:44:34Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-01
dc.identifierhttp://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000395865900032&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=6e74115fe3da270499c3d65c9b17d654
dc.identifier.citationEvgeniy A Goldis, Pablo A Ruiz, Michael C Caramanis, Xiaoguang Li, C Russ Philbrick, Aleksandr M Rudkevich. 2017. "Shift Factor-Based SCOPF Topology Control MIP Formulations With Substation Configurations." IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp. 1179 - 1190 (12). doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2574324
dc.identifier.issn0885-8950
dc.identifier.issn1558-0679
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2144/30000
dc.description.abstractTopology control (TC) is an effective tool for managing congestion, contingency events, and overload control. The majority of TC research has focused on line and transformer switching. Substation reconfiguration is an additional TC action, which consists of opening or closing breakers not in series with lines or transformers. Some reconfiguration actions can be simpler to implement than branch opening, seen as a less invasive action. This paper introduces two formulations that incorporate substation reconfiguration with branch opening in a unified TC framework. The first method starts from a topology with all candidate breakers open, and breaker closing is emulated and optimized using virtual transactions. The second method takes the opposite approach, starting from a fully closed topology and optimizing breaker openings. We provide a theoretical framework for both methods and formulate security-constrained shift factor MIP TC formulations that incorporate both breaker and branch switching. By maintaining the shift factor formulation, we take advantage of its compactness, especially in the context of contingency constraints, and by focusing on reconfiguring substations, we hope to provide system operators additional flexibility in their TC decision processes. Simulation results on a subarea of PJM illustrate the application of the two formulations to realistic systems.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe work was supported in part by the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy, U.S. Department of Energy, under Grant DE-AR0000223 and in part by the U.S. National Science Foundation Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation under Grant 1038230. Paper no. TPWRS-01497-2015. (DE-AR0000223 - Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy, U.S. Department of Energy; 1038230 - U.S. National Science Foundation Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation)en_US
dc.description.urihttp://buprimo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/openurl?date=2017&issue=2&isSerivcesPage=true&spage=1179&dscnt=2&url_ctx_fmt=null&vid=BU&volume=32&institution=bosu&issn=0885-8950&id=doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2574324&dstmp=1522778516872&fromLogin=true
dc.format.extentp. 1179 - 1190en_US
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherIEEEen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Transactions on Power Systems
dc.subjectScience & technologyen_US
dc.subjectTechnologyen_US
dc.subjectEngineering, electrical & electronicen_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.subjectPower systemen_US
dc.subjectCorrective controlen_US
dc.subjectTransmissionen_US
dc.subjectSecurityen_US
dc.subjectElectrical and electronic engineeringen_US
dc.subjectEnergyen_US
dc.titleShift factor-based SCOPF topology control MIP formulations with substation configurationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.versionPublished versionen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2574324
pubs.elements-sourceweb-of-scienceen_US
pubs.notesEmbargo: Not knownen_US
pubs.organisational-groupBoston Universityen_US
pubs.organisational-groupBoston University, College of Engineeringen_US
pubs.organisational-groupBoston University, College of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record