Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSanka, Radhakrishnaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCrites, Brianen_US
dc.contributor.authorLippai, Joshuaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcDaniel, Jefferyen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrisk, Philipen_US
dc.contributor.authorDensmore, Douglasen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-16T15:28:31Z
dc.date.available2018-08-16T15:28:31Z
dc.date.issued2018-08
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2144/30803
dc.description.abstractMicrofluidic devices published in literature today lack sufficient information for automating the physical design process. Moreover, the constantly changing landscape of manufacturing and technological requirements poses a large problem in the physical design automation space. In this talk, we discuss some of the methodologies and standards formulated by CIDAR at BU and CARES at UC Riverside that allow not only allow the researchers in the physical design automation space to share and compare their results but also provide means for capturing the Specify, Design and Build lifecycle in microfluidic design.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherIWBDA 2018en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Statesen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.subjectMicrofluidicsen_US
dc.subjectCADen_US
dc.subjectEDAen_US
dc.subjectAutomationen_US
dc.subjectSynthetic biologyen_US
dc.subjectManufacturingen_US
dc.subjectDesignen_US
dc.titleStandardizing design performance comparison in microfluidic manufacturingen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States