Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGo, Yohanen_US
dc.contributor.authorJacobsen, David Schnasaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Duseen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-20T18:18:27Z
dc.date.available2018-08-20T18:18:27Z
dc.date.issued2015-06-24
dc.identifier.citationYohan Go, David Schnasa Jacobsen, Duse Lee. 2015. "Making New Spaces In Between: A Post-Reflective Essay Weaving Postcolonial Threads into North American Homiletics." Homiletic, Volume 40, Issue 1, https://doi.org/10.15695/hmltc.v40i1.4122
dc.identifier.issn2152-6923
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2144/30819
dc.description.abstractThis post-reflective essay is intended to provide common themes/threads that repeatedly appear throughout the consultation papers. However, it should be noted that though we distill and present these threads, not only numerous voices can remain unearthed but also the threads in themselves are porous, hybrid, changing, thus resonating. The threads that we identified in the papers are as follows: Hybridity and Identity in Contemporary Homiletic, Third Space, Loss and Memory, Performative Element, Context, Postcolonial Hermeneutics/Imagination, and Self-Reflexivity. In summary, these threads can be described in the following way: First, hybrid identity is closely related with Third Space, because postcolonial preaching is to create a Third Space where hybrid identity is forged. Thus, the understanding of both concepts is crucial for postcolonial preaching. Second, the lost should be recovered since under the influence of neo/colonialism, different elements (including memory) of the past that construct identities are lost, displaced and/or removed. Third, performative element is to be considered, focusing not only how and what to preach but also where to preach. Fourth, it is important to have synchronic and diachronic views of context as well as understanding of the inherent power dynamic within contexts. Fifth, postcolonial hermeneutics/imagination is needed to revision reality in historical, dialogical, and diasporic dimension. Finally, self-reflexivity is always required in order not to reproduce colonial discourse.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofHomiletic
dc.relation.isversionof10.15695/hmltc.v40i1.4122
dc.subjectReligion and religious studiesen_US
dc.subjectPostcolonialismen_US
dc.subjectHomileticsen_US
dc.subjectNorth Americaen_US
dc.titleMaking new spaces in between: A post-reflective essay weaving postcolonial threads into North American homileticsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
pubs.elements-sourcecrossrefen_US
pubs.notesEmbargo: Not knownen_US
pubs.organisational-groupBoston Universityen_US
pubs.organisational-groupBoston University, School of Theologyen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
dc.date.online2015-06-23


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record