Boston University Libraries OpenBU
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    •   OpenBU
    • BU Open Access Articles
    • BU Open Access Articles
    • View Item
    •   OpenBU
    • BU Open Access Articles
    • BU Open Access Articles
    • View Item

    Navigating space for personal agency: auxiliary routines as adaptations in toxic organizations

    Thumbnail
    Date Issued
    2020
    Publisher Version
    10.5465/amj.2019.0880
    Author(s)
    Kahn, William A.
    Rouse, Elizabeth D.
    Share to FacebookShare to TwitterShare by Email
    Export Citation
    Download to BibTex
    Download to EndNote/RefMan (RIS)
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Permanent Link
    https://hdl.handle.net/2144/41319
    Version
    Accepted manuscript
    Citation (published version)
    William A Kahn, Elizabeth D Rouse. "Navigating Space for Personal Agency: Auxiliary Routines as Adaptations in Toxic Organizations." Academy of Management Journal, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.0880
    Abstract
    Many workers experience organization dysfunction stemming from leaders. Yet organization members have limited responses; they can directly or indirectly confront senior leaders, engage individual stress coping strategies, or leave the organization. We offer another response by theorizing auxiliary routines as behavioral sequences through which multiple actors coordinate responses to complex and enduring socioemotional dynamics that threaten to undermine the enactment of standard operating task routines. Through a qualitative, inductive study of a consulting firm, we delimit three auxiliary routines—absorption, dissemination, and differentiation—through which people navigate between the destructiveness of organizational toxicity and the need to perform given roles and tasks. We illustrate how these routines emerged in response to role and psychological diminishment originating from senior leaders, how the routines helped manage and sometimes perpetuate diminishment, and the consequences for individuals’ personal agency and the organization-as-a-whole. In doing so, we contribute to knowledge about coping with toxic organizational conditions and on routines as a facet of emotional capability in organizations.
    Collections
    • QSB: Scholarly Works [87]
    • BU Open Access Articles [3866]


    Boston University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | Help
     

     

    Browse

    All of OpenBUCommunities & CollectionsIssue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionIssue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    Deposit Materials

    LoginNon-BU Registration

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Boston University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | Help