Boston University Libraries OpenBU
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    •   OpenBU
    • Theses & Dissertations
    • Boston University Theses & Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   OpenBU
    • Theses & Dissertations
    • Boston University Theses & Dissertations
    • View Item

    Anatomical and physiological outcomes of nocturnal normobaric hyperoxia treatment in a patient with diabetic macular edema

    Thumbnail
    Date Issued
    2021
    Author(s)
    Song, Soobin
    Share to FacebookShare to TwitterShare by Email
    Export Citation
    Download to BibTex
    Download to EndNote/RefMan (RIS)
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Permanent Link
    https://hdl.handle.net/2144/43734
    Abstract
    PURPOSE: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is one of the most prevalent metabolic diseases worldwide and can lead to ocular complications such as diabetic retinopathy (DR). As chronic hyperglycemia leads to endothelial pathologies in the retina, diabetic macular edema (DME) develops and worsens visual acuity. Current treatment methods include laser photocoagulation, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections, and surgical interventions. This case report explores the effects of nocturnal normobaric hyperoxia (NNBH) treatment in a patient with DME. METHODS: A 64-year-old pseudophakic man with bilateral DME regularly treated with anti-VEGF injections was instructed to self-administer 40% fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) at 5 liters per minute (LPM) for 6 to 8 hours per day during sleep. Retrospective data of visual acuity (VA), optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging, and number of injections during a one-year time frame prior to starting NNBH was compared with newly collected data of a one-year time frame while on NNBH. RESULTS: The patient was treated with a total of 12 anti-VEGF injections in the year prior to starting NNBH treatment. After one year of supplemental oxygen, subject’s VA stabilized to 20/20 in both eyes. When comparing average values of OCT data prior to NNBH and during NNBH, all measurements including central macular thickness (CMT), maximum macular thickness (MMT), foveal volume (FV), and total macular volume (TMV) decreased anywhere from 5.4% to 20.3%, reflecting a stabilization of the retina bilaterally. Subject did not require any intravitreal injections during NNBH treatment. After one month of planned cessation of NNBH, DME recurred. CONCLUSION: This model case demonstrates NNBH may be a novel treatment approach in reducing DME and improving VA in patients with DR. NNBH can be a cost-effective, convenient, and accessible therapy for patients with complications from diabetic retinopathy.
    Collections
    • Boston University Theses & Dissertations [7858]


    Boston University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | Help
     

     

    Browse

    All of OpenBUCommunities & CollectionsIssue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionIssue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    Deposit Materials

    LoginNon-BU Registration

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Boston University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | Help