Sanka, RadhakrishnaCrites, BrianLippai, JoshuaMcDaniel, JefferyBrisk, PhilipDensmore, Douglas2018-08-162018-08-162018-08https://hdl.handle.net/2144/30803Microfluidic devices published in literature today lack sufficient information for automating the physical design process. Moreover, the constantly changing landscape of manufacturing and technological requirements poses a large problem in the physical design automation space. In this talk, we discuss some of the methodologies and standards formulated by CIDAR at BU and CARES at UC Riverside that allow not only allow the researchers in the physical design automation space to share and compare their results but also provide means for capturing the Specify, Design and Build lifecycle in microfluidic design.en-USAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Stateshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/MicrofluidicsCADEDAAutomationSynthetic biologyManufacturingDesignStandardizing design performance comparison in microfluidic manufacturingPresentation