Show simple item record

dc.creatorBitney, Kateen_US
dc.date2000-01-01
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-21T19:53:19Z
dc.date.available2012-08-21T19:53:19Z
dc.date.issued2012-08-21
dc.identifierhttp://digilib.bu.edu/journals/ojs/index.php/jfse/article/view/87
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2144/3981
dc.descriptionIn this essay, the author approaches the question \"Does Nature Have Rights ? \" from an ecofeminist perspective, using Aeschylus\' The Eumenides as emblematic of resignifying woman/nature as nonsubject, and working primarily from Val Plumwood\'s Feminism and the Mastery of Nature, with reference to the work of Grosz, Irigaray, Lovelock and others. She considers ontologies of nature as \"intentional,\" \"living\" and as a \"being\" entitled to rights, and weighs the question of revisiting metaphysics in developing an account of nature that would yield an ethos favorable to the health of planet Earth. This account refers to what Irigaray has called \"another pannisia of the divine.\"en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdfen_US
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBoston Theological Instituteen_US
dc.relationhttp://digilib.bu.edu/journals/ojs/index.php/jfse/article/view/87/87
dc.sourceJournal of Faith and Science Exchange; Journal of Faith and Science Exchange, Vol. 4en_US
dc.titleDoes Nature Have Rights? Ethical Implications in Ecologyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record