Boston University Libraries OpenBU
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    •   OpenBU
    • BU Open Access Articles
    • BU Open Access Articles
    • View Item
    •   OpenBU
    • BU Open Access Articles
    • BU Open Access Articles
    • View Item

    “Kans is king and the cultivator is his subject”: environmental history and agrarian development in modern India

    Thumbnail
    Date Issued
    2021-01-01
    Publisher Version
    10.1093/envhis/emaa060
    Author(s)
    Siegel, Benjamin
    Share to FacebookShare to TwitterShare by Email
    Export Citation
    Download to BibTex
    Download to EndNote/RefMan (RIS)
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Permanent Link
    https://hdl.handle.net/2144/43672
    Version
    Accepted manuscript
    Citation (published version)
    B. Siegel. 2021. "“Kans Is King and the Cultivator Is His Subject”: Environmental History and Agrarian Development in Modern India." Environmental History, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp. 102 - 126. https://doi.org/10.1093/envhis/emaa060
    Abstract
    Throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, cultivators and administrators in India contended with the ravages of kans grass (Saccharum spontaneum), a deeply-rooted wild sugarcane that rendered productive land wholly barren. Difficult to eliminate and endemic throughout India, kans proved particularly destructive in north and central India, particularly in the regions of Jhansi, Bundelkhand, and the Himalayan Terai. Yet the fight against this ecological antagonist was bound up in broader political transformations. As India’s colonial agriculture grew increasingly tied to global markets in the late nineteenth century, and these dry regions offered new possible spaces for settled agriculture, imperial administrators grew increasingly certain that mechanical tractors held the solution to its eradication. And as postcolonial Indian nationalists cast the production of abundant food as central to their political legitimacy, they held out the eradication of kans as a national aim, enlisting the World Bank as a partner. Yet by the 1960s, kans grass “disappeared” as an environmental foe, as faith in the promises of large-scale postcolonial planning were eclipsed by alternate visions of agricultural productivity. Pushing beyond the forests and waterways that have overwhelmingly characterized environmental history in South Asia, this article demonstrates how the ostensibly natural world could confound plans for agricultural development and the notions of state power which underwrote them. By taking up the region’s agroecosystems, this essay underscores the inexorability of ecological concerns to settled agriculture, and offers a reminder that weeds open windows into the intertwined histories of political and environmental change.
    Collections
    • CAS: History: Scholarly Papers [59]
    • BU Open Access Articles [4833]


    Boston University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | Help
     

     

    Browse

    All of OpenBUCommunities & CollectionsIssue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionIssue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    Deposit Materials

    LoginNon-BU Registration

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Boston University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | Help