Husserl, Dummett, and the linguistic turn
Files
Accepted manuscript
Date
2009-01-01
DOI
Authors
Hopp, Walter D.
Version
OA Version
Citation
WD Hopp. 2009. "Husserl, Dummett, and the Linguistic Turn." Grazer Philosophische Studien - Internationale Zeitschrift für Analytische Philosophie, Volume 78, pp. 17 - 40 (24).
Abstract
Michael Dummett famously holds that the “philosophy of thought” must proceed via the philosophy of language, since that is the only way to preserve the objectivity of thoughts while avoiding commitments to “mythological,” Platonic entities. Central to Dummett’s case is his thesis that all thought contents are linguistically expressible. In this paper, I will (a) argue that making the linguistic turn is neither necessary nor sufficient to avoid the problems of psychologism, (b) discuss Wayne Martin’s argument that not all thought-contents are linguistically communicable, and (c) present another, stronger argument, derived from Husserl’s early account of fulfillment, that establishes the same conclusion.