Long-range coupling of prefrontal cortex and visual (MT) or polysensory (STP) cortical areas in motion perception
Files
Accepted manuscript
Date
2010
Authors
Vaina, Lucia M.
Calabro, Finnegan J.
Lin, F. H.
Hamalainen, M.
Version
Accepted manuscript
OA Version
Citation
L.M. Vaina, F. Calabro, F.H. Lin, M. Hamalainen. 2010. "Long-range coupling of prefrontal cortex and visual (MT) or polysensory (STP) cortical areas in motion perception." Biomag, pp. 197 - 201.
Abstract
To investigate how, where and when moving
auditory cues interact with the perception of object-motion
during self-motion, we conducted psychophysical, MEG, and
fMRI experiments in which the subjects viewed nine textured
objects during simulated forward self-motion. On each trial,
one object was randomly assigned its own looming motion
within the scene. Subjects reported which of four labeled objects
had independent motion within the scene in two conditions:
(1) visual information only and (2) with additional moving-
auditory cue.
In MEG, comparison of the two conditions showed: (i) MT
activity is similar across conditions, (ii) late after the stimulus
presentation there is additional activity in the auditory cue
condition ventral to MT, (iii) with the auditory cue, the right
auditory cortex (AC) shows early activity together with STS,
(iv) these two activities have different time courses and the
STS signals occur later in the epoch together with frontal
activity in the right hemisphere, (v) for the visual-only condition
activity in PPC (posterior parietal cortex) is stronger than
in the auditory-cue condition. fMRI conducted for visual-only
condition reveals activations in a network of parietal and frontal
areas and in MT.
In addition, Dynamic Granger Causality analysis showed
for auditory cues a strong connection of the AC with STP but
not with MT suggesting binding of visual and auditory information
at STP. Also, while in the visual-only condition PFC is
connected with MT, in the auditory-cue condition PFC is connected
to STP (superior temporal polysensory) area.
These results indicate that PFC allocates attention to the
“object” as a whole, in STP to a moving visual-auditory object,
and in MT to a moving visual object.